QUOTE (BKLYNFRED @ Jul 3 2008, 01:34 PM)

Waterworld
i'd love to be a "fly on the wall" in some of these hollywood "pitch" meetings.
i'm assuming it must be something like...
producer: "umm, i'd like to remake mad max, but this time, on water. hell, i don't have a plot or script yet, but i've got kevin costner and he'a a big, BIG star...i should, maybe, be able to pull it off for a couple of hundred million or so. whaddya think?"
studio head: "oh man...that's a great idea. kevin costner, WOW! he's a big, BIG star! i mean, he's bank...let's do it. and hey, don't worry about that pesky budget stuff, or all that script and plot stuff, i mean...you've got costner, right? he's a big, BIG star! just go make the movie, it'll be just fine. hell, give kevin $40-50 million if you need to, aww hell...here's the studio's checkbook, do whatever you need. hell, you can even build an airstrip to fly kevin in and out of the set if you want to. i mean, he is a big, BIG star!"
producer: "thanks dude, it's gonna be great. oh...by the way, it might take 4-5 years to get it finished, is that cool?"
studio head: "hey, no probs, take your time and do it right. it's a killer idea... were gonna get rich!"
and years later, somebody pitched "norbit," ..."WOW! eddie murphy?!?!?! playing
all of the roles?!?!?!...he's is a big, BIG star!"
surely, there can't be much more to them than that, considering the crap that gets released. and you should see the screeners that we get for the "real" crap that actually gets made and never theatrically released. it's amazing, they are far worse than anything mentioned above (except for maybe, norbit

).