Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The "Business" of Music
OverTheRhine.COM -- Orchard > Entertainment > Music
bivester
hey steve, as the leading critic of the music business around here, i was wondering what you thought about your boys climbing into bed with "live nation," the evil spawn of clear channel? imho, clear channel is an svary force in broadcasting, just a notch below "news corp/fox news" and live nation exemplifies much, if not most of what is wrong with the business side of music these days (+ iirc, clear channel and it's primary ownership, the mays family are still the majority shareholders and top management of live nation, regardless of it being a "free standing" entity).

as a very vocal critic of the music industry and a huge fan of the band, i was curious to hear your thoughts on this cozy little relationship? obviously, everyone else is free to chime in too...

personally, i think further consolidation of the business is bad for everyone, except the minority at the top of the food chain, like CC, LN, U2, madonna, and a handful of others and is going to continue to drive up prices for shows, merch and yes, cds, plus it'll limit access to venues controlled or owned by LN and make it even harder for smaller, less commercial acts to break and or receive any meaningful notice.

i think it says a lot about how they view music when they simply refer to concert tickets as "inventory." unsure.gif

QUOTE
Promoter Expands Reach With U2
Live Nation, Preparing
To Battle Ticketmaster,
Signs Up Irish Band

By ETHAN SMITH
March 31, 2008

As it girds for a looming battle with IAC/InterActiveCorp's Ticketmaster, concert promoter Live Nation Inc. is looking to enlist powerful allies. The latest to sign on: U2, which has reached a 12-year deal giving the promoter exclusive rights to produce the Irish rock band's concerts, manufacture and sell its merchandise, license its image and run its Web site and online fan club.

The situation highlights the shifting landscape of the concert industry, as various players vie to expand their influence. Live Nation, the world's largest concert promoter by revenue, has said it is parting ways with Ticketmaster, the biggest ticket seller, when their partnership ends at the end of this year. Live Nation plans to launch its own competing ticket service to sell seats to its own concerts as well as events staged by others.

Live Nation hopes the likes of U2 can help it in its looming battle with IAC's Ticketmaster.

Live Nation has also acquired several companies that run Web sites and sell merchandise for artists, and it is looking for artists to sign to record deals like the one it entered last year with Madonna -- a move pitting it against record labels. Promoters, labels and ticketing companies alike are looking for ways to expand their presence online, by acquiring companies that market and promote music on the Web.

"It's clear that the lines, or the silos, that were in place historically are breaking down," Arthur Fogel, Live Nation's chairman of global music, said in an interview. Many previously disparate parts of the music business are being consolidated, he added: "Companies such as us are best positioned to execute on that basket of rights."

The U2 arrangement, which follows an even broader 10-year deal with Madonna, would guarantee desirable inventory for the new ticketing service, set to launch at the beginning of 2009.

Unlike Live Nation's $120 million deal with Madonna, the U2 agreement -- which is to be finalized soon -- doesn't cover distribution of recorded music or music publishing. For the same rights Live Nation is getting from U2, the promoter paid Madonna about $70 million. Terms of the U2 pact weren't disclosed. U2 extended its record contract with Vivendi SA's Universal Music Group late last year, according to people familiar with the matter, and also has a long-term publishing deal with Universal.

For U2, the arrangement represents a windfall that results ultimately from Live Nation's newly embattled position and its resulting need for loyal allies. The promoter is effectively paying the band to lock in the status quo: Live Nation or its predecessors have produced and promoted every world-wide U2 tour since 1997, and a Live Nation subsidiary already manages the band's Web site and fan club.

Live Nation Chairman Michael Cohl said he considers Ticketmaster "already our competition." He added that long-term artist relationships are one of two keys to the company's ability to compete effectively with its rival; the other key, he said, is building up infrastructure like venues and subsidiaries that can execute merchandise deals.

In preparing for this kind of battle, Mr. Cohl said, "one of the things you do is start to position yourself in terms of the hardware, and you try to position yourself in terms of the content. We're trying to line up as much of both as we consider meaningful and beneficial."

Live Nation's stock closed Friday at $11.83 in 4 p.m. composite trading on the New York Stock Exchange, sliding 10 cents and coming in at nearly half its closing price of $23.36 on Oct. 10, the day before the Madonna deal became known.

Formed in Dublin in 1976, U2 remains one of the most potent live draws in the world. Its most recent tour was the second-highest-grossing concert tour in history, earning $389.4 million at the box office, according to data from Billboard magazine. The Rolling Stones' 2005-07 "Bigger Bang" tour took in $558.3 million. Live Nation promoted both. U2's record sales haven't held up quite as well; 2004's "How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb" wasn't among the 10 best-selling albums in the U.S. that year.

The deal may also offer ways for U2 to address problems that arose on its last tour. The band offered members of its online fan club, who paid $40 apiece to join, early access to tickets. But during the so-called fan-club presales, many would-be buyers encountered frustrating waits and a limited, expensive inventory comprising some of the worst seats in the house.

Ticketmaster had a hand in the presale fiascoes, inasmuch as its infrastructure couldn't handle the surge of ticket requests that flooded its computers. But people involved say the bigger problem was that there were simply too many members in the club to provide them all premium seats.

"We feel we've got a great Web site," U2 lead singer Bono said in a statement. "But we want to make it a lot better." U2.com is already hosted by Signatures Network, one of several merchandising companies recently acquired by Live Nation; they are being merged into one unit.

While Live Nation has been snapping up artists along with companies that provide them services, No. 2 concert promoter AEG Live has been seeking to make strategic moves of its own. Earlier this month talks stalled in a deal for Ticketmaster and Cablevision Corp. to take a 49% stake in the promoter, which is owned by Anschutz Corp.

IAC and Dow Jones & Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal, together operate a personal-finance Web site.
WalrusOct9
They jumped the shark back in '04 when they outsourced their fan club to FanFire, who royally screwed things up during the initial Vertigo tour ticket sales. I don't see this being any better.

I think this is going to be just as disastrous, especially when I see bands like Pearl Jam and Nine Inch Nails becoming more and more independent with every passing year, yet remaining successful (especially on the road). The difference, I think, is that U2 still lives under the illusion they can be relevant, and don't want to end up being a (retardedly successful) cult band like Pearl Jam is now, or be a purely nostalgic act like the Stones who's new albums, regardless of quality, are almost entirely ignored.

The irony of that is that Clear Channel (which is closely tied with Live Nation) specifically tells it's stations not to play new music by older acts like Bruce Springsteen...likely U2 will get somewhat better treatment with their next album since promotion of that album will directly benefit Clear Channel, but it's not like anyone who cares enough about music to spend $100 on a ticket listens to terrestrial radio anyway.

I don't know...I think it's a horrible, horrible idea, almost Bush-level idea. I don't really know how to balance that with being a fan of the music and the band as live performers. I don't know if any totally non-musical related thing could make me less of a fan of the music, but it has sparked some internal thought, I'm not gonna lie. I've read a lot of books and articles about the ZooTV period especially, and it does bother me how far they seem to have regressed since then in non-musical ways.


It also pains me as a diehard U2 fan and slightly less hardcore but still dedicated Nine Inch Nails fan how stubborn and regressive one band is while the other is taking significant strides to move into the future and try new things. I've cut U2 a lot of slack for various non-musical things over the last 5 or 6 years, but if this turns out to be as much of a disaster as I think it is, I don't know how forgiving I will be.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.