QUOTE(taliendo @ Mar 31 2005, 02:10 PM)

While I agree that the lyrics are pretty straight forward, and that the chord progression is simple -- I think it's those things that really draw me to the song. Sometimes simple is better. Sometimes simple means purity.
Not to mention, some of the best songs in the world are derived from those same three chords (G-C-D.)
I recall Linford saying in one of his interviews with Jeff Holland something along the lines of "Karin's got it all: she's a babe, she cracks me up, she cooks a good [something he likes],
she can write a classic-sounding song..." And at the Mennofolk show in October (I think that's where I heard it, maybe Josh can back me up here), introducing "I Want U2B My Love", they said that they've got sort of a running competition for who can write the simplest song, and "Karin really raised the bar with this one."
The simple, classic-sounding song seems to be a fairly consistent ideal that they hold for their songwriting. I think it fits with their general aesthetic/ethos: make a homestead on an old farm in the middle of Nowhere, print a book with moveable type and woodcuts, celebrate the community they've fostered among their fans in an intimate gathering with candles and an upright piano, write songs that sound like they could be from an earlier time. And I think "Poughkeepsie" is the prototype of that inclination in their writing. The song it most reminds me of is "Orphan Girl", which is probably the simplest of all of Gillian Welch's neo-traditional songs, and the only one K&L cover.
Obviously, I'm not saying that this yen for the simple and traditional encompasses their aesthetic, but it's an important aspect of it, and one that I resonate with personally. I love the song, largely for it's simple, timeless quality. However, I can appreciate the complaints of those who wish it leant itself to something other than a straight-up-folk treatment. Jessyka, I wish you could have heard it at Mennofolk with Linford on the pipe organ. Actually, that was less an evolution than a mutation.
There is one way that this song has evolved, though, and that is my only real gripe about it. Has anyone else noticed that on GDBD the first line of the chorus is "I ride on the backs of the angels
tonight", but ever since a couple of years after that, Karin's been singing "angels
in flight"? This is exasperating to me; she's trading in a repetition of the last line with the first (a fine traditional form) for a redundancy, and one that is more cumbersome to articulate, just to include another word that rhymes with "ight"? ACK

I don't understand.